We need to think of public concern first and our concerns second to with a Public Relations Fight
We need Public Relations. That is going to be true today, tomorrow, and
the day after the NIH study is published. Yes, it will get covered by
the media. But then the study will fade away and the media will stop
covering it. They will stop covering it because patients don't make any
news for them to cover. The NIH study does not mean the messages we
want to convey to the public will get there.
Public Relations for our disease is needed. It will be needed after the
NIH study is published and after all subsequent rumored positive
papers are published. However, just because we have a message to give to
the public does not mean they want to hear it.
If we want the public to hear us then we need to tell the public what
matters to them, not what matters to us. This is what will make the
public care what matters to us.
What matters to the public is what is newsworthy, and what affects
their family, friends and neighbors. How can we ever hope to win the
public to our side if we are only interested in talking about ourselves?
We can hook the public with several newsworthy facts that are about
them. That is how we make the public care. Journalists care about
newsworthy facts. Politicians care about what effects their polls, and
their support from the public. The public cares about what influences
their life, and the lives of their family and friends.
Here are some of those issues the public is going to care about:
1. CFS and its link to XMRV
2. How many healthy people may be walking around carrying XMRV (4% of
the population, possibly 7% of the population if we go by the Alter
slide)
3. Three countries have taken the precautionary measure of banning
people with CFS from donating blood, but the U.S. has not. While a lot
about XMRV is unknown, just as a precaution, the blood supply needs to
be protected.
Now these things don't say anything about patient care, problems with
the CDC website, problems with our name and diagnostic criteria. Those
are our concerns, and they are valid concerns.. But they cannot be
addressed all at once, and nor will a public listen to it if they don't
understand in the first place why it matters to them too.
In addressing the public, we must think first and foremost about their
concern, rather than our own. We need to make ME/CFS matter to every
part of society. We can't do that while we're telling the public only
what concerns us.
To illustrate my point, I would like you to think of this scenario. You
turn on the tv, and there is an ad about purple disease. You've never
heard of purple disease before. The commercial tells you there has been a
fight about the name of purple disease, some want to call it blue,
others yellow. Patients with purple disease want lots of things. They
want recognition. They want help. They want money for research. They
want drugs to fight purple disease.
How fast would you switch the channel? How does the fight about purple
disease affect you? Do you care about purple disease research based on
this ad? What does purple disease have to do with you and your family?
Why would you give a dollar or lift your finger during your busy life
for something that does not touch your life in any way at all?
Now imagine a different scenario. You turn on the tv, and there is an ad
for purple disease. You've never heard of purple disease before. The
commercial disease tells you what purple disease is, and that it's been
highly associated with an infectious disease. You hear other countries
are taking action to make sure that the public is not exposed to this
disease through the blood supply. You are told how many people may be
carrying this infectious disease. You are told about outbreaks and
stories about blood transfusions where people developed purple disease
shortly after. At the end of the commercial you are asked to go to a
website to donate and learn more about purple disease.
Do you care about purple disease now? Do you see and feel how purple
disease could affect your family without ever actually using the literal
words? Without being told all the issues that concern patients, does it
now concern you? And now that you're concerned that purple disease is a
serious thing what are you going to do? Hopefully, you are saying
"yes, yes." and nodding as you read this.
Yes, we need the public to care about us. We need the public to be on
our side. We need the public to run for us, walk for us, donate to
research, write letters to the government on our behalf. We need
politicians to move mountains.
Please ask yourself, why would the public care about our concerns if we
are not putting the concerns of the public first?
We only have seconds to reach the public, before they turn the page,
before they turn the channel. We live in the age of the soundbyte. Where
words and entire sentences are reduced to letters. How fast do you
stop looking at things that have nothing to do with you? How quick do
you tune out from messages that are not thinking about your needs, or
your life?
To get the public to care about us, we have to talk about their concerns
as it relates to us first.
Those concerns are XMRV and the blood supply.
Andrea Martell
Blue Ribbon Campaign for M.E./CFS http://www.BRCforME.org/
The Blue Ribbon Campaign was started in April 2009 by an M.E./CFS patient in Canada. The purpose of the campaign is to raise awareness of a devastating disease known as Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS).